Indian Judgements
Maniklall Sahu, the appellant, along with three co-accused, trespassed into the house of Rekhchand Verma, assaulted him with sticks and fisticuffs, and flung him from a terrace. The injured person, Rekhchand Verma, initially survived but was in a critical condition. He eventually succumbed to his injuries approximately nine months after
The appellant, Siddharth, an Advocate, was aggrieved by adverse observations made regarding his conduct in an impugned order of the High Court, while deciding Writ Petition No. 6228 of 2022. These observations cast an aspersions on the appellant’s conduct while he was representing writ petitioners before the High Court. The
The case concerned an appeal against the High Court of Karnataka’s judgment, which upheld the conviction of the appellant, Geeta, under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), albeit with a reduced sentence of three years imprisonment. The High Court maintained the Trial Court’s fine of Rs. 5,000/-. The
Core issue related to government Employment, Migration of Reserved Canditates to Unreserved Category. The Supreme Court decided the two cases. Matter not decided on base of any Principle but base of relevent law related. In First Case relevent law bar migration in that matter, In that matter Supreme Court Upheld
Maha Mineral Mining & Benefication Pvt. Ltd. (the Appellant) submitted a bid in response to a Notice Inviting Tender (NIT) issued by Madhya Pradesh Power Generating Co. Ltd. & Anr. (the Respondent) on 17.05.2024. The tender was for run-of-mine (ROM) coal beneficiation and logistics from Western Coalfields Ltd. (Nagpur area)
The case involves appeals against common impugned judgments and orders dated 12.10.2018 and 26.02.2019. Respondents-writ petitioners, who applied as reserved OBC candidates, availed age relaxation for the post of Constable (GD). Despite availing this relaxation, they scored marks higher than the last selected candidate in the unreserved category. They claimed
This case involves Mallesswari (Appellant), the daughter of Munasamy Naidu and Muniammal, and K. Suguna (First Respondent), among others. The dispute originated from a suit (OS No. 192 of 2000) filed by Subramani (Mallesswari’s brother, son of Munasamy Naidu) for partition of ancestral properties. An ex-parte preliminary decree was issued
Maniklall Sahu, the appellant, along with three co-accused, trespassed into the house of Rekhchand Verma, assaulted him with sticks and fisticuffs, and flung him from
