This civil appeal arose from an interim order passed by the Division Bench of the Karnataka High Court, which had stayed a Commercial Court’s Section 9 injunction order restraining the respondent from manufacturing and marketing certain electric vehicles in an ongoing commercial dispute. During the proceedings before the Supreme Court,
This appeal addressed whether the restriction under Section 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, requiring trademark infringement suits to be instituted before a court not inferior to a District Court, is overridden or rendered ineffective by notifications under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, which empower Civil Judges (Senior Division)
These civil appeals arose from an impugned order of the High Court directing the entertainment of applications filed by party respondents under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Supreme Court allowed the appeals and set aside the High Court’s order, holding that an application under Section 28A
These civil appeals arose from an order of the Punjab and Haryana High Court, which had quashed the acceptance of the technical and financial bids of the highest ($H_1$) bidder (Micky Traders) and directed the issuance of a Letter of Acceptance to an eligible tenderer. The Supreme Court dismissed the
This criminal appeal challenged the High Court’s dismissal of the appellants’ appeal and the affirmation of their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the IPC for a triple murder, along with a Trial Court direction that they “remain in prison till rest of their life”. While the
This appeal arose from a challenge to the dismissal of a Second Appeal by the Allahabad High Court, which had affirmed the First Appellate Court’s decision declaring the removal of the respondent (‘Rakshak’ in the Railway Protection Special Force) null and void under Article 311(1) of the Constitution. The lower
This appeal centered on whether a High Court, while exercising its statutory appellate jurisdiction under Section 37(1)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the rejection of a Section 9 interim relief application, can by consent of the parties remit those appellate proceedings to a newly constituted Arbitral Tribunal
