The Supreme Court of India allowed the criminal appeals filed by the appellants, setting aside the concurrent judgments of the Trial Court and the High Court which had convicted them under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The Apex Court held that the prosecution
This judgment by the Delhi High Court deals with a regular bail application filed under the NDPS Act where the accused was implicated solely based on a co-accused’s disclosure statement and online transaction records after 1.228 kg of ganja was recovered from the co-accused. Justice Girish Kathpalia noted that no
This judgment by the Delhi High Court involves a revision petition filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, challenging an eviction order passed by the Additional Rent Controller (ARC). The High Court addressed the significance of a subsequent definitive order passed by the Ministry of Home
In this petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioners sought the quashing of FIR No. 397/2021 registered at Police Station Najafgarh for offences under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC). The Delhi High Court allowed the petition after interacting
This judgment delivered by the High Court of Delhi addresses an execution application filed under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking the release of a deposited decretal amount in a commercial enforcement petition. With the decree-holder satisfying requisite stamp duty requirements and the judgment debtors offering
The Supreme Court of India addressed whether the activities undertaken by public sector oil companies (BPCL and HPCL) in selling Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) supplied by Mahanagar Gas Limited (MGL) through their retail petrol pump outlets qualify as a “Business Auxiliary Service” under the Finance Act, 1994, thereby attracting service
In these two criminal appeals filed under Section 21 of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) Act read with Section 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), the NIA challenged the orders dated July 18, 2026, passed by the Trial Court granting regular bail to respondents Khurram Parvez and Irfan
