The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition filed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking the quashing of criminal proceedings, including a supplementary chargesheet and summoning order, against a medical practitioner (Dr. Poonam Mishra) accused of unlawfully terminating the pregnancy of a minor. The petitioner faced charges under Sections 313

The Delhi High Court allowed two petitions under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking the quashing of criminal complaints, summoning orders, and all consequential proceedings initiated by the Department of Food Safety concerning samples of MAGGI Noodles lifted in May 2015. Emphasizing the subsequent judicial developments—including the Bombay High Court’s

In a criminal reference made by a Special Judge under Section 395 read with Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court comprehensively resolved key questions of law regarding the scope and applicability of the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018. The Court ruled that

The Delhi High Court allowed a criminal miscellaneous petition seeking the quashing of FIR No. 600/2015 registered under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 of the IPC at Police Station Jaitpur, based on a voluntary compromise between the parties. Noting that the marriage between petitioner no. 1 and respondent no. 2