
In this judgment, the High Court of Delhi disposed of an anticipatory bail application filed by Vinod Kumar Sharma in connection with FIR No. 116/2025 registered at Cyber Police Station Dwarka for offenses under Section 318(4), 319, and 3(5) of the BNS. During the hearing, the Additional Public Prosecutor (APP)
This criminal appeal challenged the judgment and order dated October 26, 2018, passed by the High Court of Kerala, which had dismissed the appellant-husband’s petition to quash a complaint filed under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act). The Supreme Court evaluated whether proceedings under the
This batch of criminal appeals arose from separate orders passed by the High Court of Bombay (Circuit Bench at Kolhapur) and the Additional Sessions Court, Satara, concerning regular bail applications in connection with a brutal murder case (FIR No. 261 of 2024 registered at Satara Taluka Police Station). The incident
This judgment addresses a batch of Special Leave Petitions (Criminal) filed by the petitioner, Kailash Ram, challenging multiple orders and judgments passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan (Jaipur Bench). The core controversy revolved around two aspects: first, the refusal to quash FIRs filed against the petitioner and
This civil appeal arose from an order passed under Section 86 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, which had rejected an election petition filed against the successful candidate from the No. 7 Karimganj Parliamentary Constituency, Assam. The High Court had dismissed the petition due to improper attestation of
In this judgment, a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissed an appeal filed under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962, challenging the CESTAT order that upheld the revocation of the appellant’s Customs Broker licence, forfeiture of security deposit, and imposition of penalty. The appellant’s licence was targeted