In the case of Dr. Bais Surgical and Medical Institute Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. Dhananjay Pande (2026), the Supreme Court of India ruled that a person who has invested substantial funds and is treated as a stakeholder by a company can be regarded as a “member” for the purpose
In the case of Reliance Eminent Trading and Commercial Private Limited v. Delhi Development Authority (2026), the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the application of summary judgments in commercial disputes, ruling that courts must not force parties into full-fledged trials when a defense is clearly “baseless
In the case of Prem Porwal and Others etc. v. Jagdeesh Chandra Prajapati and Others (2026), the Supreme Court of India set aside a High Court order for the demolition of 54 shops, ruling that the proceedings violated the principles of natural justice and exceeded the proper scope of writ
In the case of Nandi Infrastructure Corridor Enterprises Ltd. & Anr. v. B. Gurappa Naidu & Ors. (2026), the Supreme Court of India set aside a High Court order and restored the valuation fixed by an Executing Court, ruling that land converted for industrial use within municipal limits must be
In the case of Narendra Singh v. The State of Madhya Pradesh (2026), the Supreme Court of India set aside the conviction of a father-in-law for cruelty, ruling that the prosecution failed to prove dowry harassment and that family members cannot be implicated based on contradictory and unsubstantiated claims. Case
In the case of Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay v. Union of India & Ors. (2026), the Supreme Court of India addressed a batch of petitions and appeals concerning the legal framework for addressing hate speech and rumor-mongering, ultimately ruling that the existing laws are adequate but require consistent enforcement. Core Legal
In the case of R. Iyyappan & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors. (2026), the Supreme Court of India set aside a High Court judgment and directed the government to regularize the services of “Gang Labourers” at an ISRO facility, ruling that the State must act as a “model
