Supreme Court set aside a High Court judgment that had overturned a civil court’s partition decree regarding the execution of a Will. The Supreme Court held that the High Court failed to provide a reasoned, transparent judgment in its capacity as the final court of fact and improperly included disparaging
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the application for interim bail filed by the accused, Karan Parcha, in connection with FIR No. 727/2022, finding no merit to grant the requested relief. The applicant, Karan Parcha, sought interim bail for a period of one month. The case relates to FIR No.
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the anticipatory bail application of the accused, finding that video evidence clearly depicts her participation in a violent incident where a police party was attacked to facilitate the escape of an individual in custody. The Court further noted that the accused is currently absconding
The High Court of Delhi granted regular bail to the accused applicants, Hemant Gupta and a co-accused, in connection with a murder case (FIR involving offenses under the IPC and Arms Act), primarily based on the principle of parity with a previously granted co-accused, Shamsher, as neither of the applicants
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the bail application of the accused/applicant, Salam @ Channa, in connection with FIR No. 999/2021, observing that the gravity of the alleged offense—an “honour killing”—and the testimony of the deceased’s mother supporting the prosecution’s case made it an unfit case for granting bail. Case
The High Court of Delhi granted regular bail to the accused, Sagar, in FIR No. 636/2023, observing that the accused had been in custody since November 20, 2023, without charges being framed due to procedural delays, and noting discrepancies in the identification process by the secret informer. Case Background: The
The High Court of Delhi disposed of the writ petition, holding that the petitioners have equally efficacious alternative legal remedies available, such as approaching the Court of the Metropolitan Magistrate, and that invoking the Court’s writ jurisdiction without exhausting these remedies is not permissible. Furthermore, the Court declined to intervene
