The Supreme Court allowed an appeal filed by the legal representatives of a motor accident victim, seeking further enhancement of compensation. A bench comprising Justice N.V. Anharia examined the principles governing the assessment of a deceased person’s monthly income and the entitlement of children to parental consortium under the Motor
This civil appeal arose from eviction proceedings initiated by landlords against a tenant occupying a shop premises who subsequently entered into an agreement to sell for the purchase of the property. While the tenant resisted eviction by arguing that the execution of the agreement to sell and payment of part
This criminal appeal arose from a tragic incident on February 17, 1998, where the appellant, Balku Oram, along with a co-accused, dragged a woman named Puni Naik from her home and severely assaulted her with a lathi after blaming her for practicing witchcraft that allegedly caused the death of a
This civil appeal arose from a surprise inspection conducted at the premises of the appellant, a High Tension consumer, where authorities subsequently issued a provisional assessment order amounting to over ₹3.23 crores alleging electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003. While the Single Judge of the High
This criminal appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a brutal incident on February 17, 2016, where the appellant, Balesh Kumar Kuraiti, lured a 3-year-old minor girl and subjected her to aggravated penetrative sexual assault. While the Trial Court convicted him under Section 376(2)(i) of the IPC and Section 6
This commercial enforcement petition (OMP (ENF.) (COMM.) 201/2025) along with an accompanying application was filed by the decree-holder, B M Construction Company, against the judgment debtor, Union of India. During the hearing before the High Court of Delhi, the counsel representing the decree-holder sought permission to withdraw the petition. Accepting
This commercial miscellaneous petition (O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 319/2026) was filed under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by the petitioner, D C Ajmera, against the National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL) and the Bank of Maharashtra. During the proceedings, counsel for the respondent bank explicitly stated that the original
