2025 INSC 41
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
(HON’BLE J.K.
MAHESHWARI, J. AND HON’BLE RAJESH BINDAL, JJ.)
SHRI JAIN SHWETAMBER
SHRI SANGH ...
Petitioner
VERSUS
STATE OF RAJASTHAN
Respondent
Civil
Appeal Nos. 206 of 2025 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.25759 of 2023)-Decided on
06-01-2025
Civil. CPC
Civil Procedure Code,
1908, Section 89 - Mediation Act, 2023, Section 19 – Mediation – Settlement - A former Judge of the Supreme Court appointed as
mediator - Report of mediation has been received and a Compromise Agreement has
been signed by the parties on 07.12.2024 - In view of the terms of settlement
between the parties, the balance sum of ₹8,00,00,000/- (Rupees Eight
Crores only) was paid by the respondent no.4 vide a demand draft drawn on
Punjab National Bank in favour of the appellant - Hence, the terms regarding
payment of amount have been complied with and the parties have undertaken to
comply with the other terms as well - As
a result of the settlement the above-mentioned cases i.e. Case No(s).57 of 2023
& Case No(s).43 of 2006 pending before Nyayalaya SDO (Upkhand Adhikari)
Ajmer and SBCWP No.1635 of 2017 pending before the Rajasthan High Court, Bench
at Jaipur, between the parties shall stand disposed of as settled without any
further action by any of the parties - Appeal disposed of while modifying the
judgment and decree of the Courts below in terms of the settlement arrived at
between the parties, which shall form part of the decree.
(Para
3 to 7)
JUDGMENT
Rajesh Bindal, J.:- Leave granted.
2.
The appellant approached this Court impugning the judgment[Dated 02.08.2023] of the High Court[Rajasthan High Court, Bench at Jaipur] passed in S.B. Civil First
Appeal No.1015 of 2019. Vide the aforesaid judgment, appeal challenging
the judgment and decree[Dated
12.07.2019] passed by the Trial Court in Civil Suit No.22 of 2017, was
dismissed.
3.
This Court vide order dated 01.12.2023, considering the lis between the
parties, and with their consent, referred the matter to mediation and as
agreed, Hon’ble Mr. Justice S. Ravindra Bhat, Former Judge of this Court, was
appointed as mediator. The report of mediation has been received and a Compromise
Agreement has been signed by the parties on 07.12.2024. In terms of the
agreement, a sum of ₹8,11,00,000/- (Rupees
Eight Crores and Eleven Lakhs only) is to be paid by respondent no.4 to the
appellant. Whereas, in accordance to the terms between the parties, ₹11,00,000/- (Rupees
Eleven Lakhs only) was paid at the time of execution of the Compromise
Agreement vide Cheque No.228699 dated 24.10.2024 drawn on Punjab National Bank.
4.
The terms settled between the parties are extracted below:
“5. That as a result
of the sincere efforts of the Mediator - Hon'ble Mr. Justice (Retd) S. Ravindra
Bhat, party no.1 and party no.2 have amicably settled all the disputes and
issues between them on the following terms:-
(i) That party no.1
Shri Jain Shwetambar Shree Sangh or its office bearers shall have no right,
title, interest, possessionor claim in the Dadabari complex. The Dadabari
complex and all the movable and immovable property including the Bhandars will
be of the sole ownership, possession and management of the party no.2 i.e. Shri
Jain Shwetambar Khartargachh Sangh.
(ii) The two temples
in Ajmer city (Sambhavnath Bhagwan ka Mandir, Lakhan Kothri, Ajmer, and
Rishabhdev Bhagwan ka Mandir, Sundar Vilas, Ajmer) and all the movable and
immovable properties thereof shall be owned and managed solely by party no.1
Shri Jain Shwetambar Shree Sangh. Party no.2 Shri Jain Shwetambar Khartargachh
Sangh will have no right, title or interest or possession thereof nor shall it
interfere with the management of the aforesaid two temples in Ajmer City.
(iii)
The parties to this settlement have with respect to the bank accounts agree as
under:
Bank Accounts of Shri Jain Shwetambar Shree Sangh
a. Shri Jain Shwetambar Shree Sangh A/c no.
0771 2413 000 307, Bank Name - Punjab National Bank, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer,
Rajasthan - 305001.
b. Shri Jain
Shwetambar Shree Sangh A/c no. 0771 2413 000 308, Bank Name- Punjab National
Bank, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan - 305001.
c. Shri Jain
Shwetambar Shree Sangh A/c no. 0771 2413 000 309, Bank Name- Punjab National
Bank, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer, Rajasthan - 305001.
It is agreed and
declared that the right to operate and make any withdrawals in respect of the
abovesaid accounts shall be solely of Shri Jain Shwetambar Shree Sangh. Party
no.2 shall have no claim to any of the above accounts in any respect, nor shall
they claim any balance or right to operate. Furthermore, amounts paid to party
no.1 by party no.2 shall be deposited in Shri Jain Shwetambar Shree Sangh A/c
no. 0771 2413 000 307, Bank Name- Punjab National Bank, abovesaid.
(iv) That party no.2
shall pay a sum of Rs.8,11,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Crores and Eleven Lakhs only)
in the following manner: -
a. A sum of Rs.11,00,000/- (Rupees Eleven
Lakhs only) is being paid by party no.2 to the party no.1 upon execution of the
present agreement by Cheque no.228699 dated 24.10.2024 drawn on Punjab National
Bank.
b. The balance sum of
Rs.8,00,00,000/-(Rupees Eight Crores only) would be paid by the party no.2 to
party no.1 at the time of passing of final order by the Hon'ble Supreme Court.
(v) Upon payment of
the total sum of Rs.8,11,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Crores and Eleven Lakhs only)
by party no.2 Shri Jain Shwetambar Khartargachh Sangh to party no.1 i.e. Shri
Jain Shwetambar Shree Sangh, neither Party shall be left with any dispute or
claim hereinafter.
(vi) That both parties
agree that the following cases filed by any of the parties herein are pending
between them which they do not seek to contest. They further agree that a joint
application would be made to the Hon'ble Supreme Court for quashing/closing
these cases in exercise of its powers under Art. 142.
S.No. |
In
the Court |
Case
No. |
Title |
1. |
Nyayalaya
SDO (Upkhand
Adhikari)
Ajmer
|
57/2023 |
Mandir
Margi Panchayat Oswal jariye Shri Jain Shwetambar Shri Sangh Panjikrit Ajmer banaam Ajmer Vikas Pradhikaran
evam Anya |
2. |
Nyayalay
SDO (Upkhand
Adhikari),
Ajmer |
43/2006 |
Shri
Jain Shwetambar Shri Sangh banaam Shri Jain Khartargacch Sangh |
3. |
Rajasthan
High Court, Bench at Jaipur |
SBCWP
1635/ 2017 |
Shri
Jain Shwetambar Khartargacch
Sangh v. Shri Jain Shvetambar Shree Sangh |
(vii) That party no.1
and party no.2 have mutually agreed that in case there is any other litigation
before any Court or Tribunal or Authority, they shall have withdraw/ close the
same in pursuance of the present compromise.
(viii) Parties further
agree that the details of all such cases would be given in the common
application to be filed before the Hon’ble Supreme Court for taking on record
the present compromise/ settlement with a request to incorporate it in the
order of the
Hon’ble Court and quash all such proceedings
between the parties.
(ix) That the party
no.1 and party no.2 would request the Hon’ble Supreme Court to make the present
compromise a part of the record of the Court and to dispose of the SLP (Civil)
24759/2023 in terms of the present compromise.
(x) That both parties
have agreed to withdraw all allegations made by them before any Court or
authority against each other and their office bearers and will not use the said
allegations in any proceedings whatsoever. On filing of this Compromise
agreement, the said allegations will be deemed to have been automatically
withdrawn. Party no.2 shall not challenge the registration of the party no.1
trust under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act.
(xi) Both the parties
assure that in relation to the Dadabari Complex, Sambhavnath Bhagwan ka Mandir,
Lakhan Kothri, Ajmer, and Rishabhdev Bhagwan ka Mandir, Sundar Vilas, Ajmer, no
further litigations/cases/complaints shall be filed against each other or their
office bearers by the parties.
(xii) That both the parties hereby confirm and
declare that they have voluntarily and of their own free will have arrived at
this settlement.
(xiii) That the
present compromise deed shall be a solemn undertaking by both parties to the
Hon'ble Supreme Court of India for compliance of the terms contained herein.”
5.
In view of the terms of settlement between the parties, the balance sum of ₹8,00,00,000/- (Rupees
Eight Crores only) was paid by the respondent no.4 vide a demand draft bearing
no.970398 dated 12.12.2024 drawn on Punjab National Bank in favour of the
appellant. Hence, the terms regarding payment of amount have been complied with
and the parties have undertaken to comply with the other terms as well.
6.
As a result of the settlement the above-mentioned cases i.e. Case No(s).57 of
2023 & Case No(s).43 of 2006 pending before Nyayalaya SDO (Upkhand
Adhikari) Ajmer and SBCWP No.1635 of 2017 pending before the Rajasthan High
Court, Bench at Jaipur, between the parties shall stand disposed of as settled
without any further action by any of the parties.
7.
We dispose of the present appeal while modifying the judgment and decree of the
Courts below in terms of the settlement arrived at between the parties, which
shall form part of the decree.
8.
A copy of this order be sent to the Courts concerned for placing the same on
record of the files of the pending cases and to consign those to records as
settled.
9.
Pending application (if any) shall stand disposed of.
------